New zebra crossings and a mini roundabout for Mays Lane area…and a new controlled parking zone is also on its way

Barnet Council has completed a major programme of road safety measures around Mays Lane and surrounding roads.
A controversial width restriction has been removed, new zebra crossings installed, a 20-mph speed limit zone extended, more yellow lines painted on the roads and dropped kerbs provided.
In announcing what it says is the completion of the largest ever such scheme in the borough’s history, the council fails to mention that further changes are about to be made.
Despite vociferous opposition from the Underhill Residents Group, the council is going ahead with an experimental controlled parking zone in 16 roads north of Mays Lane which are on either side of Chesterfield Road.
The new Underhill South zone – to be designated the US zone – is to be operated on an experimental basis for 18 months from Monday 15 December.
Originally the council proposed the zone should extend to a total of 29 roads on either side of Mays Lane but after a groundswell of opposition this was cut back to the 16 roads where a council survey indicated “extremely high levels of parking stress” caused by the demand for off-street parking by Barnet Hospital staff, patients and visitors.
The new road safety improvements in Mays Lane extend all the way from its junction with Barnet Lane in the east to Shelford Road in the west, with additional measures in Chesterfield Road, Quinta Drive and Whitings Road.
A new mini roundabout has been installed on Whitings Road at the junction Whitings Road and Bells Hill.

Perhaps the most contentious change is the removal of the width restriction on Mays Lane close to the junction with Manor Road and Leeside.
London Fire Brigade had raised concerns because the restriction impeded fire engines and reduced their response time.
There were also complaints about unacceptable levels of emissions resulting from queueing vehicles, but residents in two nearby roads – Hillside Gardens and Manor Road – claim that the removal of the width restriction has already led to increased traffic – and larger vehicles – using short cuts to avoid jams in Barnet town centre.
Quinta Village Green Residents Association says the increase in heavier vehicles along Mays Lane has fundamentally changed the nature of what was always, outside the commute period, a quiet, residential lane. –
However, on potential change following the removal of the width restriction is that it might be possible to re-route the Uno 243 bus between Barnet Hospital and Hatfield via Underhill, Mays Lane and Manor Road.
At present the 243 stops at Barnet High Street and High Barnet tube station on its route from Hatfield to Barnet Hospital and on its return to Hatfield stops at the Wood Street and Union Street junction and again in Salisbury Road.
Councillor Nik Oakley, Hertsmere Council’s cabinet member for transport – who led the campaign for the restoration of a bus service between Potters Bar and Barnet – told the Barnet Society that possibilities for amending the route of the 243 had been suggested to Uno bus.

Barnet Council’s go ahead for the Underhill South CPZ – in the face of sustained opposition from the Underhill Residents Group – will require the installation of resident parking bays, yellow lines and signs and posts in 16 roads on either side of Chesterfield Road.
This work will need to be completed by the start of the scheme on Monday 15 December.
Residents in the affected roads will have a six-month period during which they give their reaction to the CPZ. A final decision on its operation will be taken by the council after the 18-month trial.
The Underhill Group has already collected over 750 signatures for a petition opposing the introduction of a CPZ which it says was opposed by a majority of the residents and had been rejected by 60 per cent of those living in the 16 roads included in the scheme.
In explaining why the CPZ was approved, the council says parking stress surveys indicated there was support for parking controls and only “the most problematic roads” had been included in the experimental scheme.
Given the introduction of extensive new double yellow lines, the Quinta Village Green Residents Association says it fears this will result in a loss of car parking spaces and only amplify the problems caused by the long-standing displacement of parking from the hospital.
The roads included in the new US CPZ are Chesterfield Road, Dexter Road, Dormer Close, Edwyn Close, Greenland Road, Howard Way, Jarvis Close, Juniper Close, Matlock Close, Niton Close, Nupton Drive, Sampson Avenue, Sellwood Drive, Shelford Road, St Anna Road and Stanhope Road.

We are calling for the removal of the recently implemented bus lane on High Barnet High Street. This change has forced more drivers to use Mays Lane as a cut-through, increasing congestion in the area. The new bus lane is causing heavier traffic and higher emissions along High Barnet High Street. Removing it would help restore traffic flow and reduce pollution for local residents.
The downhill bus lane is good as a bus user, not sure the uphill one benefits much.
I agree since the removal of the width restriction in Mays Lane, the level of traffic using Hillside Gardens has increased dramatically. I live in the middle and it is now extremely difficult to get my car off my drive. Cars speed up and down the road all day long and it’s only a matter of time before a terrible accident occurs. Some form of traffic calming measure needs to be introduced. 20mph and speed bumps or cameras.
Also the CP Zone was originally going to be extended from number 48 down to the bottom. We are just past there and it is impossible for visitors to park near our house. All the resident parking spaces up the hill are usually empty but we are not able to buy a parking permit because we “don’t live in a CPZ area”. Quite often it is difficult to get our car off the drive due to selfish parking outside our house so we would have welcomed the extended CPZ.
The issue with parking in that area is almost exclusively due to the proximity of the hospital, which has nowhere near enough capacity in its car park. Rather than spend a huge amount on creating a CPZ, new road markings etc, why not invest in a multi-storey car park for the hospital that can accommodate the large number of staff and visitors?